GG扑克

咨询热线:025-7596823

首页 > 新闻动态

越看越离谱的VAR(愈看愈荒诞的VAR)

发布时间: 2026-01-16

Exploring VAR Challenges

think

I'm considering the steps for an on-field review, focusing on issues like offside lines, handball changes, and subjectivity. There's a lot to unpack, like terms around “deliberate play vs. deflection” and frame rate problems. I could break down a recent match if the user shares details, or provide a checklist for judging calls. Additionally, mentioning how different leagues handle VAR differently, like EPL vs. UEFA, could be useful, especially since the user seems interested in Chinese soccer. I'll keep it concise and neutral!Addressing VAR Issues

there

I want to touch on why there's so much frustration with VAR: things like threshold inconsistencies, line-drawing errors, frequent changes in handball rulings, unclear communication, and slowed game pace. VAR can intervene in four specific situations, relying on the standard of "clear and obvious error."

如果你想更

If the user wants, I could provide a quick checklist for penalties, handballs, and offside calls. For more specifics, sharing the match details would allow me to assess situation-by-situation based on protocols or summarize league differences and improvement suggestions.

VAR 确实越看越离谱的感觉,常见就卡在这几件事:

match

  • 门槛不一致:只该介入“明显而清楚错误”,但不同联赛/不同组执行尺度飘。
  • 画线与帧误差:越位依赖选帧+肢体点,技术/人为都有误差;边线摄像头缺失更糟。
  • 手球口径反复:什么是“自然/扩大体积”“故意/非故意”赛季内常有调整。
  • 沟通不透明:裁判与VAR对话不公开,观众只看到结论,不知道推理。
  • 节奏被打断:回放久、解释少,观感差。

VAR实际规则要点(很多争议就是超出它的权限):

  • 只介入4类:进球、点球、直接红牌、错判对象。
  • 标准是“明显而清楚错误/重大遗漏”,不是重新当一遍主裁。
  • 建议现场复核(OFR)才算改判有说服力;纯耳麦改判观感更差。

你要不要给我具体一场球+分钟数?我可以按协议逐条帮你判:

speci

  • 说明当时判罚、回放角度、潜在犯规点,我给出是否达到了VAR介入门槛的理由。

快速观赛小抄(自测判罚是否合理):

  • 越位:选帧是否在传球瞬间?肢体最前沿是谁?有无“干扰对手/争抢”成分?
  • 手球点球:手臂是否扩大体积?距离近到来不及躲?是否先碰到其他部位?
  • 接触犯规点球:是否有“明确后果”的接触(绊/踩/拉拽)?主裁视线是否被挡,属于“重大遗漏”?
  • 红牌(DOGSO/严重犯规):是否四要素齐全(方向、距离、控球可能、人数)?动作危险程度如何?

如果你想更系统点,我也可以:

  1. 逐场/逐回合做事件复盘清单;或
  2. 汇总各联赛差异(英超/欧战/国际赛、是否用半自动越位SAOT);或
  3. 提出改进方案:公开音频、半自动越位全面铺开、挑战权试点、固定“清楚明显”示例库。